the first two weeks of January, the most difficult month of the calendar 2011, has been intense, before proceeding, we clarify some doubts:
1 .- The sources of information request by DF INFOMEX , the Concession Agreement signed by the Chief Clerk of GDF and Business Fast Track Controller Poets, there you can find on page 8, two sections that are marked with black, the first in paragraph 3 or 4, the second in the final there is the amount who gave the company the GDF , we have the uncensored version where you read that amount 600 million pesos, the first source: Contract Concession.
2 .- Why do we resist and how far we are willing to go? Simple, because it has systematically violated the law, FROM APRIL 22, 2008, then to amend three laws: the property regime, the Works and Procurement, to check is to read the texts of these previous laws to September 15, 2008 and compare them with those published on that date, and read the daily proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of 29 August 2008, where has the discussion on the adoption of such changes. How far can we go? until the provisions of existing laws the DF from the Constitution, the Statute of Government and those relating to participation citizen and access to information, as well as those relating to civil rights and local politicians, federal and international ARE MET BY THE CHIEF GOVERNMENT.
Turning to other matters, the idea of \u200b\u200bdefending the rights of citizens, rife in our capital, the truth is not difficult for this to happen when our head of government aid and works to impose public use force to do so.
More than public works, business seem concluded in advance and source of income for the year 2012.
outrageous what happened in Narvarte , and is even more offensive to talk about dialogue when his forces used to simulate, for example, says that the vast majority of neighborhood committees in the city are made so.
On Saturday we found a note published in Millennium where neighbors Azcapotzalco demand to be taken into account and fully informed before building a stadium in the area of \u200b\u200bFoundry, appealing to citizens' rights as the basis for its refusal.
On the other hand is the closure achieved through the efforts of one neighborhood committee PRD not in Magdalena Contreras , for violation of the land use of San Jerónimo, congratulations on this achievement; about Eduardo Hernández, Head borough in Magdalena Contreras, would be very good before opinions are well informed about land use in the area, and that ensures that "there is a certificate attesting to the use of land for rights acquired from 1991 ", that strange, where did such a document will be out? together since 1991 in St. Jerome had limited any changes to land use, not by intrigue but say that "money dance with the dog", is it?.
already going on, let's talk Supervía on Thursday 13 in the evening, the CDHDF called Citizens for Contreras to announce the preliminary document RECOMMENDATION 1 / 2011 ADDRESSED TO THE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MARCELO EBRARD CASAUBON AND HEADS IN Delegacional ALVARO OBREGON AND MAGDALENA CONTRERAS, EDUARDO SANTILLAN AND EDUARDO ROJAS HERNANDEZ rspectivamente.
In the preliminary reading of the draft Recommendation 1 / 2011, relating to the Project System Bridge, Tunnel and Distributors south west of Mexico City ( Supervía West), in compliance process started April 12, 2010 related to the complaint (by Citizens for Contreras) on the violation of citizens' rights to information, participation and decisions referred to in the Constitution of the United States Mexican , the Statute of Government DF , the laws of Access to Public Information and local and federal Citizen Participation, as well as the guarantee of legal security of neighboring expropriated by the GDF , day 6 of the same year.
On the issue, the draft recommendation addresses the following points:
Throughout the nearly 70 pages that comprise this document, the Commission documented the violation human rights to a healthy environment (Article . 4th. Constitutional), water rights, right to information, legal certainty and citizen participation (political rights) among others.
questions the lack of evidence and justification considerations that prompted the authority to amend the regulations (relating to changes to the law issued on September 15, 2008: Regime patrimonial Construction and Procurement Law), notes the lack of compliance sustained agreements with neighbors and lack of motivation and failure law by the authority of GDF ;
The draft document, the CDHDF recommends that the Head of Government
- Suspension of the Work
- Making a wide and diverse public consultation to consider the development of a mobility project to consider the needs of the area and stresses the need for any project has an MIA alternative that involves a working group that issued
Ensuring transparency in procedures and exercise rights from the information, in addition to modifying Regulation of environmental impact and risk.
These are some of the aspects contained in the preliminary document that will be released on Tuesday and Thursday of next week, which inform you in advance .
The road has been long and tedious, however, that the authority is not obliged to accept the recommendation, this is a step in achieving our main objective and focus of our opposition to the project: repeated violation of legal and civil rights in this part of the principal capital required to meet them: Government Chief DF.
understand that the battle has been won, we have engaged various stakeholders, from citizens and neighbors in the individual to organized groups, with different methods of struggle, but converging on the objective: stop the Supervía barbarism called Poniente.
For us it has been a long journey started back in May 2008, still missing in this story, and do not relent until the law is enforced.
In defense of our heritage and quality of life
CITIZENS FOR CONTRERAS
0 comments:
Post a Comment